Without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all.
Considering the pigmentation category the current rating of five suggests users & critics considering the question "how pigmented is this product?" mainly suggest opaque.Īt blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. Considering feedback for the colour category the current five suggests evaluating "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" mainly indicate true to colour. On the long-wearing category an average total of four is a sign that in response to the "how long-wearing is this product?" mainly favor stays all day. In the moisturizing category a rating of four indicates responses to "how moisturizing is this product?" mostly responded hydrating. Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews for this dusty red hued lipstick so far: Reviewing the application category an average of four suggests reviewers when asked "how did this product apply?" usually favor glides.
0 kommentar(er)
